Reducing Emissions through Low-Carbon and Biomaterials: The Case of Green Office Enjoy, Paris

Jolin Kaman; Eunike Kristi Julistiono

doi:10.9744/acesa.v7i1.14590

Authors

Jolin Kaman Petra Christian University
Eunike Kristi Julistiono Petra Christian University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4232-9192

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/acesa.v7i1.14590

Keywords:

biomaterial, embodied carbon, fly ash replacement

Abstract

Drastic transformation in the construction industry is required to achieve global net-zero targets while accommodating the continuing need to build to anticipate the growing population. With the increase implementation of energy efficient building, the significant of embodied carbon becomes higher. The use of biomaterial has great potential to reduce building emissions. This paper presents a case study that has been built with engineered timber components, and examines to what extent, a further reduction of embodied emissions can be performed. Three material replacements were proposed to further decarbonize the building emissions, and the embodied carbon reductions resulted by changing the timber specification and fly ash use in concrete mixture were assessed quantitatively with embodied carbon assessment. Results show that by replacing the building materials with lower carbon options, the embodied carbon of the case study can be reduced from 52 to 242 tons of CO₂e or 2.82 to 12,99 kgCO₂e/m².

References

Austria-architects. (2019). Green Office® Enjoy timber and plus-energy. https://www.austria-architects.com/en/baumschlager-eberle-architekten-lustenau/project/green-office-r-enjoy-timber-and-plus-energy

Arqa. (2019, March 18). Green Office®, a sustainability milestone. https://arqa.com/arquitectura/green-office-enjoy-paris-batignolles.html

Arquitectura Viva. (n.d.). Green office ENJOY Building, Paris. https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/edificio-de-oficinas-green-office-enjoy-7

Baumschlager Eberie Architekten. (2018). Green Office® ENJOY Paris, France. https://www.baumschlager-eberle.com/en/work/projects/projekte-details/green-officer-enjoy-1/

Beama. (2022, March 15). How can we decarbonise the built environment? https://www.beama.org.uk/what-s-new/news/how-can-we-decarbonise-the-built-environment.html

Brandner, R., Tomasi, R., Moosbrugger, T., Serrano, E., & Dietsch, P. (Eds.). (2018). Properties, testing and design of cross laminated timber. Shaker Verlag. https://doi.org/10.2370/9783844061437

Brandner, R., Flatscher, G., Ringhofer, A., Schickhofer, G., & Thiel, A. (2016). Cross laminated timber (CLT): Overview and development. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 74, 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-0999-5

Brown, D. (2017, October 10). Parametric timber connections for Revit - Dylan Brown Designs. Dylan Brown

Designs. https://dylanbrowndesigns.com/resources/parametric-timber-connections-for-revit/

BuildInWood. (2020). Which timber building system should I use? Building systems overview. Retrieved from: https://design-guide.build-in-wood.eu/building-systems-overview/

Craig, J., & Hammond, G. (2019). Embodied Carbon – The ICE Database (Version 3.0). https://circularecology.com/embodied-carbon-footprint-database.html

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Domenech, T. (2014, July 25). Explainer: What is a circular economy? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-a-circular-economy-29666

Duffield Timber. (2021, October 21). Hardwood vs. softwood: What are the differences? https://duffieldtimber.com/the-workbench/timber-trends/hardwood-vs-softwood-what-are-the-differences#:~:text=Hardwoods%20derive%20from%20 angiosperm%20trees,is%20usually%20denser%20and%20stronger.

Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Global greenhouse gas overview. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-overview#:~:text=However%2C%20changes%20in%20land%20use,total%20global%20greenhouse% 20gas%20emissions

Evison, D. C., Kremer, P. D., & Guiver, J. (2018). Mass timber construction in Australia and New Zealand - Status, and economic and environmental influences on adoption. Wood and Fiber Science, 50, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.22382/wfs-2018-046

Falk, A. (2013, July 24–26). Cross-laminated timber: Driving forces and innovation [Paper presentation]. 2nd International Conference on Structures and Architecture, Portugal. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265054157_Cross-laminated_timber_driving_forces_and_innovation

Foster, R. M., & Reynolds, T. P. S. (2018). Lightweighting with timber: An opportunity for more sustainable urban densification. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 24(1), 02518001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000301

Ghodsian, N. (2024, February 19). Sustainable construction technology; Ultimate guide in 2024. https://neuroject.com/sustainable-construction-technology/

Gibbons, O. P., Orr, J. J., Archer-Jones, C., Arnold, W., & Green, D. (2022). How to calculate embodied carbon (2nd ed.). The Institution of Structural Engineers. https://www.istructe.org/sitefiles/handlers/DownloadFile.ashx?productId=9767

HM Treasury. (2013, November). Infrastructure Carbon Review. https://www.constructionleadershipcouncil.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/PU1593-Infrastructure-Carbon-Review-FINAL.pdf

International Organization for Standardization. (2006). Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework (ISO 14040:2006).

Jelec, M., Varevac, D., & Rajcic, V. (2018). Cross-laminated timber (CLT) - A state of the art report. Journal of the Croatian Association of Civil Engineers, 70(2), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.14256/jce.2071.2017

Lehmann, S. (2013). Low carbon construction systems using prefabricated engineered solid wood panels for urban infill to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 6, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2012.08.004

Mallo, M. F. L., & Espinoza, O. (2014). Outlook for cross-laminated timber in the United States. BioResources, 9(4), 7427–7443. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.4.7427-7443

Muñoz-Pérez, S. P., Lozano-Sánchez, J. J., Ramírez-Silva, D. M., Vallejos-Medianero, J. E., & Malpartida-Iturregui, J. De D. (2024). Use and effect of fly ash in concrete: A literature review. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia, 111, 105-118. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.20230927

Nayak, D. K., Abhilash, P. P., Singh, R., Kumar, R., & Kumar, V. (2022). Fly ash for sustainable construction: A review of fly ash concrete and its beneficial use case studies. Cleaner Materials, 6, 100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.100143

Ness, D. (2020). Growth in floor area: The blind spot in cutting carbon. Emerald Open Research 2020, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13420.3

Ramage, M. H., Burridge, H., Busse-Wicher, M., Fereday, G., Reynolds, T., Shah, D. U., Wu, G., Yu, L., Fleming, P., Densley-Tingley, D., Allwood, J., Dupree, P., Linden, P. F., & Scherman, O. (2017). The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 333–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107

Röck, M., Saade, M. R. M., Balouktsi, M., Rasmussen, F. N., Birgisdottir, H., Frischknecht, R., Habert, G., Lützkendorf, T., & Passer, A. (2020). Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation. Applied Energy, 258, 114107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107

Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors. (2017). Whole life carbon assessment for the built environment. https://www.rics.org/content/dam/ricsglobal/documents/standards/whole_life_carbon_assessment_for_the_built_environment_1st_edition_rics.pdf

Schmidt, M., Crawford, R. H., & Warren-Myers, G. (2020). Quantifying Australia’s life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for new homes. Energy and Buildings, 224, 110287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110287

Simonen, K., Rodriguez, B. X., & De Wolf, C. (2017). Benchmarking the embodied carbon of buildings. Technology|Architecture + Design, 1(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2017.1354623

Stora Enso. (2018). Green Office Enjoy Paris, France. https://references.buildingsolutions.storaenso.com/en/projects/office/ france/green-office-enjoy

Veka. (2023, March 9). Double glazed windows vs laminated glass – Which to choose? https://vekauk.com/insight-hub/double-glazed-windows-vs-laminated-glass-which-to-choose/

World Green Building Council. (2019). Bringing embodied carbon upfront. https://worldgbc.org/article/bringing-embodied-carbon-upfront/

United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). 2021 global status report for buildings and construction: Towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/2021-global-status-report-buildings-and-construction

United Nations Environment Programme. (2023). Building materials and the climate: Constructing a new future. Nairobi. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/43293

United Nations Environment Programme. (2024). Beyond foundations: Mainstreaming sustainable solutions to cut emissions from the buildings sector. https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/45095

UN-Habitat. (n.d.). Green building materials fact sheet: Timber. https://unhabitat.org/green-building-materials-fact-sheet-timber#:~:text=Of%20the%20conventional%20building%20materials%2C%20sustainably%20harvested%20timber,of%20greenhouse%20gases%20of%20any%20conventional%20building%20material

Younis, A., & Dodoo, A. (2022). Cross-laminated timber for building construction: A life-cycle-assessment overview. Journal of Building Engineering, 52, 104482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104482