About the Journal
Focus and Scope
Advances in Civil Engineering and Sustainable Architecture (ACESA) (ISSN: 2716-0890) is an open access international journal dedicated to present the discourses on the built environment from multiple perspectives in various design-related disciplines: civil engineering, architecture, spatial design, and other relevant fields. The idea of ACESA emphasises the sustainability aspects that push the sensitivity of civil engineers and architects, which might be manifested through the users’ inhabitation, through the materiality of objects and built environment.
The journal is committed to exploring the concept of building design, structure, and construction research as either primary or secondary subjects. This can be dissected through theoretical discussions or empirical studies, addressing both the tangible and intangible elements of the built environment.
The journal is published biannually, in March and September, by Petra Christian University in Surabaya, INDONESIA. ACESA welcomes a broad spectrum of contributions, include original research articles, case and technical reports, and review articles, all contributing to the global dialogue on sustainable practices within Civil Engineering and Architecture.
Authors are invited to submit articles that address the questions of built environment in a wide range of sustainability context, which may include but not limited to:
Civil Engineering :
- Contemporary building construction
- Indigenous building structure
- Historic building structure
- Construction technology
- Management construction
- Experimentation and simulation in building structure
- Material engineering
Architecture :
- Building and spatial design
- Material and building resources
- Sustainable urban development and urban design
- Indigenous settlements
- Vernacular architecture
- Building service
- Culture in architecture
- Digital design and manufacture
- BIM and parametric design and computational design methods
- Education and pedagogical
- Experimentation and simulation on sustainable built environment
- Life cycle analysis
- Settlement and community
Peer Review Process
All manuscripts are reviewed by single-blind reviewers (Anonymous peer review) consisting of an editor and members of the International Editorial Board or qualified outside/external reviewers. This is done within the shortest given time. The journal, above all, strives to return reviewers’ comments to authors within 3 weeks. The International Editorial Board re-review manuscripts that are accepted until they are revised.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides open access to its content distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This allows free access to the work and permitting any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to soware, or use them for any other lawful purpose. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Repository Policy
Advances in Civil Engineering and Sustainable Architecture allows all versions of the article (submitted, accepted, or published) to be deposited in an institutional or another repository of the author’s choice without embargo, such as Sherpa/Romeo, Dulcinea, Diadorim, or Petra repository (Publisher's repository).
Publication Ethics
Advances in Civil Engineering and Sustainable Architecture (ACESA) is a peer-reviewed electronic international journal. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (Petra Christian University). This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed ACESA journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.
Petra Christian University as publisher of ACESA takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Petra Christian University and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.
Publication Decisions
The editor of the ACESA journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Plagiarism Check
Plagiarism is a threat to scholarly publishing in general and to Advances in Civil Engineering and Sustainable Architecture in particular. Originality of the submitted work can be assured through plagiarism screening and rejection of suspected material. For maximum effectiveness, all articles submitted to this journal shall be sent to a plagiarism detection process prior to submission. The editors will run plagiarism check using Turnitin for the submitted manuscripts before sending to reviewers.
Article Processing Charge
Advances in Civil Engineering and Sustainable Architecture does NOT apply any Article Processing Charges (APC) as Article Submission Charges.
License Term
Articles published in the Advances in Civil Engineering and Sustainable Architecture (ACESA) will be Open-Access articles distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). This allows for immediate free access to the work and permits any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose.