ANALISA RISIKO KECELAKAAN KERJA DI PT.XYZ
Abstract
PT. XYZ is a global leader in the shoe industry that produces innovative shoes for men, women and children with the best quality and quality and become one of the world's leading shoe manufacturers. The purpose of this study is to determine the conditions of occupational injury risks and determine the priority of handling accidents and provide benefits in the form of proposals that need to be done company to minimize or prevent accidents at PT. XYZ. Risk Analysis is done by use Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) method dan Risk Assesment step on Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Risk Control (HIRARC) method. At PT. XYZ can still be said to have a large risk of accidents so that should be given improvements in order to minimize and prevent the risk of work accidents. Low risk of occupational injury by 20%, moderate accident risk by 42%, and high occupational accident risk by 38%. Priority of work handling that has high accident risk there are 13 categories of accidents from total 69 categories of work accident. Priority of work handling that has medium accident risk there are 29 categories of accidents from total 69 categories of work accident. The risk of accidents in a high company need to be considered and followed up to be reduced even to avoid the accident.References
1. Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor : 05/PRT/M/2014 tentang Pedoman Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (SMK3) Konstruksi Bidang Pekerjaan Umum. Jakarta: Sekretariat Kabinet RI; 2014.
2. Sugandi: Didi. 2003. Keselamatan Kerja dan Pencegahan Kecelakaan Kerja. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.A: Ahmed. 2014. Composite FMEA For Risk Assesment in The Construction Projects. Milan: Italia
3. Notoatmodjo: Soekidjo. 2007. Promosi Kesehatan dan Ilmu Perilaku. Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta.Davidson: G. 2005. Towards understanding the root causes of outdoor education incidents. Waikato: NZ
4. Nurkertamanda:. 2009. Analisa Mode Dan Efek Kegagalan/ FMEA) Pada Produk Kursi Lipat Chitose Yamato Haa. Semarang.
5. McDermott: R. E: Mikulak: R. J: Beauregard: M. R. 2009. The Basic of FMEA – Second Edition. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
6. Peldez: J. B. 1995. Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode: effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety: 200-213.
7. Y.M. Wang: K. C. 2009. Risk evaluation in Failure Mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications: 36(2): 1195-1207.Irawan: Sandy: et al. 2015. Penyusunan Hazard Identification Risk Assessment and Risk Control (HIRARC) di PT. X. Volume III. No 1. Januari 2015.
8. Priest: S. 1996. Employing the accident frequency- severity chart. Journal of Adventure and Outdoor Learning: 13(1): 22-24
9. Ramli: Soehatman. 2010. Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja OHSAS 18001. Dian Rakyat. Jakarta.
10. Rijanto: Boedi. 2011. Pedoman Pencegahan Kecelakaan di Industri. Mitra Wacana Media. Jakarta.
11. Irawan: Sandy: et al. 2015. Penyusunan Hazard Identification Risk Assessment and Risk Control (HIRARC) di PT. X. Volume III. No 1. Januari 2015.
12. Zolfagharian S dan Ressang A. 2011. Risk Assessment of Common Construction Hazards among Different Countrie. Sixth International Conference on Contruction in the 21st Century (CITC-VI). Kuala Lumpur Malaysia. Juli 2011: hlm. 151-160.
13. A: Ahmed: 2014. Composite FMEA For Risk Assesment in The Construction Projects Based on The Integration of the conventional FMEA with the Method of Pairwise Comparison and Markov Chain. Milan: Italia : Politeknik Milan
