A Fallacy Analysis of the Arguments on the First U.S. Presidential Debate Between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

Authors

  • Jennifer Marella Santoso Petra Christian University, Jl. Siwalankerto No.121-131, Siwalankerto, Wonocolo, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/katakita.5.2.65-71

Keywords:

backhoe, dump truck, waktu siklus, produktivitas, optimum

Abstract

This research studies the fallacy in the arguments on the first 2016 U.S. presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. This research is aimed to find out the fallacies occurred in the debate, the dominant fallacy made by each candidate, and the similarities and differences in each candidate’s fallacy. The topic on fallacy is chosen because fallacies are persuasive, yet misleading arguments which might contribute on influencing the people’s vote. In analyzing the data, the writer used the theory of arguments by Bierman and Assali (1996) and the theory of fallacy by Inch and Warnick (2011). From the total of 22 arguments, four of which are sound arguments. There is a total of 25 fallacies falling into six types which occurred. The most frequently occurred fallacy type is the “straw person” while the “audience-based” category becomes the dominant fallacy category. Furthermore, the writer found that Clinton made all of the sound arguments while Trump made all of the “hasty generalization” and the “ad populum” fallacy.

Author Biography

  • Jennifer Marella Santoso, Petra Christian University, Jl. Siwalankerto No.121-131, Siwalankerto, Wonocolo, Surabaya
    English Department

References

Bierman, A. K., & Assali, R. N. (1996). The critical thinking handbook. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2009). Argumentation and debate: critical thinking for reasoned decision making (12th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Gallup. (n.d.). Most important problem. Retrieved February 18, 2017, from Gallup: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1675/most-important-problem.aspx

Inch, E. S., & Warnick, B. (2011). Critical thinking and communication: the use of reason in argument (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Jacobson, L. (2016, September 26). Donald Trump wrong that 'you will learn more' from financial disclosure form than from tax returns. Retrieved from Politifact: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/sep/26/donald-trump/donald-trump-talks-about-his-finances-first-presid/

Krieg, G. (2016, December 22). It's official: Clinton swamps Trump in popular vote. Retrieved March 29, 2017, from CNN Politics: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/

Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C., & Johnson, J. (2004). Writing arguments: a rhetoric with readings (6th ed.). United States of America: Pearson Education.

Reinhold, R. (2016, September). Donald Trump ESTP Hillary Clinton INTJ - leadership styles. Retrieved from Personality Pathways: http://www.personalitypathways.com/article/trump-clinton-mbti-type.html

Rieke, R. D., Sillars, M. O., & Peterson, T. R. (2005). Argumentation and critical decision making (6th ed.). United States of America: Person Education.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles