Studi Perbandingan Routing Protocol Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) dan Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) pada IPv6 dengan Menggunakan Simulator Graphical Network Simulator 3 (GNS3)
(1) Program Studi Teknik Informatika
(2) Program Studi Teknik Informatika
(3) Program Studi Teknik Informatika
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Since the development of computer networks, humans no longer have to implement computer networks in real conditions but can be implemented through network simulators. One of them is GNS3 (Graphical Network Simulator 3). Due to this development, IPv4 stocks have reached their limits and will be replaced with IPv6.
Various routing protocols are available to support IPv6. The routing protocols are OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) and EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol). OSPF and EIGRP have many differences in the algorithm used, so in this study will be analysed the comparison of both routing protocol in IPv6 implementation. In this study, will be designed a computer network and tested. Testing is done by using ping and trace route. In addition, there is also testing for convergence time.
The results show that the value of delay and throughput of OSPF is better 2-15% than EIGRP on the condition of the connection is not down. On the other hand, when the connection was down, EIGRP is better 45-52% for delay and 38-48% for throughput. Both have the same value for packet loss during normal connection and EIGRP is better 11-16% when connection down. In addition, EIGRP has an initial convergence time of 8 seconds, while OSPF is within 19 seconds. Moreover, EIGRP has convergence time while adding links with a time of 2-6 seconds and OSPF with a time of 8-10 seconds.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Azmi, R. N. 2012. Analisa performa Jaringan Mobile IPV6 pada Horizontal Handover dan Vertical Handover dengan Aplikasi Game Flash. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknik, Teknik Komputer, Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.
Bowo, M.E.A. 2009. Penggunaan IPv6 Sebagai Solusi Pengganti IPv4 dalam Penanganan Keterbatasan IP Address di Jaringan Internet Masa Depan. Makalah. Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Teknik Informatika, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta.
Cambodiani, Y. 2013. EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol). Komunitas eLearning Ilmu Komputer,1-15.
Dewannanta, D. 2007. Mengenal Software Simulator Jaringan Komputer GNS3. Komunitas eLearning Ilmu Komputer, 1–7.
Edi, D. 2006. Kajian Algoritma Routing dalam Jaringan Komputer. Jurnal Informatika UKM, Vol. II,No 3, (65), 47–55.
Handayani, N. K., Rochim, A. F., & Isnanto, R. R. 2015. Simulasi Jaringan Multiprotocol Label Switching ( MPLS ) Menggunakan Graphical Network Simulator ( GNS3 ), 1–7.
Linuwih, B. A., Virgono, A., dan Irawan, B. 2016. Design and Analysis Software Defined Networking for Lan Network : Application
Perdana, W. W., Munadi, R., & Purwanto, Y. 2011. Analisis Perbandingan Implementasi Protokol Routing Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol ( EIGRP ) Dan Open Shortest Path First ( OSPF ) Untuk Layanan Video Streaming. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknik Elektro, Teknik Telekomunikasi, Universistas Telkom. Bandung
Prawira, D. Y., Rambe, A. H., Kunci, K., & Switching, M. L. 2015. Analisis Kinerja Jaringan Multiprotocol Label Switching ( MPLS ) untuk Layanan Video Streaming, 30–35.
Priyono. E. D., Suryawan. F., Wantoro. J. 2012. Simulasi Routing Protocol OSPF dan EIGRP Berserta Analisa Perbandingannya dalam Menentukan Kinerja yang Paling Baik. Skripsi. Fakultas Komunikasi dan Informatika, Teknik Informatika, Universitas Muhammadiyah, Surakarta.
Rahmawati, I. D., Shaleh, A., dan Winarno, I. 2010. Analisa QoS Pada Jaringan MPLS Ipv6 Berbasis Routing OSPF, 1–7.
Rifiani, V., Hadi, M. Z. S., dan Darwito, H. A. 2011. Analisa Perbandingan Metode Routing Distance Vector dan Link State pada Jaringan Packet. EEPIS Repository, 2–7.
Yusup, M. 2016. Pengertian GN3 dan konfigure. Versi eletronik, (diakses 12 Mei 2017).
Zazuli, L., & Rosidi, A. 2015. Developing Computer Network Based on EIGRP Performance Comparison and OSPF. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 6(9), 80–86.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal telah terindeks oleh :