Analisis Perbedaan antara Perencanaan dan Kebutuhan Tenaga Kerja Aktual menggunakan Metode DMAIC untuk Produk Bottle dan Cap

Martin Theo Purnomo(1*), Prayonne Adi(2),


(1) Industrial Engineering Department, Petra Christian University
(2) Industrial Engineering Department, Petra Christian University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research was conducted to analyze the causes of the differences between planning and actual labor requirements for Bottle and Cap products at PT X. Planning for manpower requirements were calculated through SAP software, while the actual labor requirements were carried out by manual calculation of production process requirements. Analysis of the causes of the problem is carried out using the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC) method. The DMAIC method is a method commonly used in Six Sigma to solve problems. After doing the analysis, it is found that the differences that occur are caused by changes in people's needs from the time of planning to the actual production. Changes in people's needs are caused by production problems (reject, downtime, and loss hour), and improper planning. So that the root cause of the difference in planning and actual productivity is; machine failure or worker error, as well as outdated planning data.


Keywords


arrangement man power; labor requirements; productivity; DMAIC; 5 whys method

Full Text:

PDF

References


Verhoeven, C. J., Techniques in Corporate Manpower Planning: Methods and Applications, Kluwer Boston, Massachusetts, 2013.

Sherafat, A., Tafti, A. V., Yazdani, A. R., and Davoodi, S. M. R., Designing a Model for Measuring Manpwer Productivity in the Project-based Service Organizations (Electricity Company as Case Study), International Journal of Academic Research in Business Ad Social Sciences, 2013, pp. 173-174.

Pyzdek, T., and Keller, P. A., The Six Sigma handbook: A Complete Guide for Green Belts, Black Belts, and Managers at All Levels, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, 2010.

Parmenter, D., Pareto’s 80/20 Rule for Corporate Accountants, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, 2007.

Sleeper, A. D., Design for Six Sigma statistics: 59 Tools for Diagnosing and Solving Problems in DFSS Initiatives, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006.

Barsalou, M. A., Root Cause Analysis: A step-by-step Guide to Using The Right Tool at The Right Time, CRC Press, New Jersey, 2015.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.