EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF RIBLETS ON BUS BODY TOWARDS DRAG COEFFICIENT

Matthew Sebastian(1*), Fandi D. Suprianto(2), Teng Sutrisno(3),


(1) 
(2) 
(3) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Heavy vehicles such as buses and trucks, generally have a form that is not very aerodynamic, usually
very long and boxy. Aerodynamics can be very influential on the use of fuel when the coefficient of
drag is reduced, the vehicle can be more efficient in their use of fuel because the force that inhibits
will be reduced. One way to reduce this drag force is with riblets. Riblets is a structure shaped like a
bunch of lined trenches. The results of the study on flat plate showed that with the riblets, up to 10%
drag reduction can be achieved with the blade structure compared with only a flat surface under the
same conditions.
Methods to validate the experiments were performed using simulation results with experimental
results from the wind tunnel at a speed of 16-27 m/s. Bus model created by CAD software according
to its original shape to be tested in the wind tunnel and then compare it with the results of the
ANSYS Fluent simulation. Riblets geometry studied using ANSYS Fluent simulation and the
results of the Boundary Layer will be observed as the riblets geometry changes. From the research, it
is known that the best riblets geometry is 1% of the overall length of the bus and with the application
of said geometry, 1.46% drag reduction can be obtained, from Cd 0.548 to 0.54. The model with the
best drag reduction uses riblets on the front roof of the bus.


Keywords


Coefficient of drag, Riblets, Wind Tunnel, Boundary Layer, Aerodynamics.

Full Text:

PDF

References


ANSYS Inc. (2009). Meshing Help.

ANSYS Inc. (n.d.). Introduction to ANSYS

FLUENT : Turbulence Modeling.

Bhusan, B., & Dean, B. (2010). Shark-skin

surfaces for fluid drag reduction in turbulent

flow : a review. Royal Society Publishing

Journal. Retrieved November 19, 2015

Cengel, Y. A., & Cimbala, J. M. (2006). Fluid

Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications.

McGraw-Hill.

de Souza, A. (2005). How to - Understand

Computational Fluid Dynamics Jargon.

NAFEMS Ltd.

El Gharbi, N., Absi, R., Benzaoui, A., & Amara,

E. (2009). Effect of near -wall treatments on

airflow simulations. Computational Methods

for Energy Engineering and Environment.

Fox, R. W., McDonald, A. T., & Pritchard, P. J.

(2011). Introduction to Fluid Mechanics.

Wiley.

Hucho, W.-H. (1987). Aerodynamics of Road

Vehicles. Elsevier.

Lanfrit, M. (2005). Best practice guidelines for

handling Automotive External Aerodynamics

with FLUENT. Germany: Fluent Deutschland

GmbH. Retrieved 05 21, 2016, from

http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~nwb/lectures/

GoodPracticeCFD/Articles/Ext_Aero_Best_Pr

actice_Ver1_2.pdf

Mohamed, E. A., Radhwi, M. N., & Gawad, A.

F. (2014). Computational investigation of

aerodynamic characteristics and drag reduction

of a bus model. American Journal of Aerospace

Engineering.

Mokhtar, W., & Hasan, M. (2016). A CFD

study of Wind Tunnel Wall Interference.

American Society for Engineering Education.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.