Analisa Corporate Governance dan Corporate Social Responsibility di Indonesia
(1)
(2)
(3)
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Penelitian dilakukan untuk meneliti pengaruh Corporate Governance sebagai variabel independen dan Corporate Social Responsibility sebagai variabel intervening pada Firm Performance sebagai variabel dependen dengan moderasi Firm Size pada perusahaan di Indonesia. Teknik analisis data menggunakan teknik statistika multivariat dengan software SmartPLS untuk mengetahui pengaruh langsung dan moderasi pada setiap variabel dalam penelitian ini.
Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa Corporate Governance dan Corporate Social Responsibility berpengaruh positif dan signifikan pada Firm Performance, Corporate Governance berpengaruh negatif pada Corporate Social Responsibility, dan variabel moderasi Firm Size berpengaruh negatif dan tidak signifikan seluruhnya baik terhadap hubungan Corporate Governance pada Firm Performance maupun hubungan Corporate Governance pada Corporate Social Responsibility. Dalam hal ini disimpulkan bahwa pada perusahaan di Indonesia, Corporate Governance tidak dapat mendorong motivasi stratejik perusahaan dalam melakukan pelaporan Corporate Social Responsibility meski ditemukan bahwa dengan melakukan praktek Corporate Governance yang semakin ketat maka perusahaan di Indonesia dapat memperoleh dampak positif pada Firm Performance begitu pula hubungan langsung Corporate Social Responsibility yang berdampak positif pasa Firm Performance.
Kata kunci: Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Performance, Firm Size
This research was conducted to examine the conformity analysis between Corporate Governance as independent variable and Corporate Social Responsibility as intervening variable at Firm Performance as dependent variable with Firm Size moderation. Data analysis techniques using multivariate statistical with SmartPLS software to determine the direct effect and moderation on each variable in this study.
The result of the research shows that Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility have positive and significant influence on Firm Performance, Corporate Governance have negative effect on Corporate Social Responsibility, and Firm Size moderation effect has negative and insignificant effect both on Corporate Governance relationship in Firm Performance and Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. In this case it can be concluded that in companies in Indonesia, Corporate Governance cannot encourage company’s strategic motivation in Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure although it is found that by doing tighter Corporate Governance practices, company in Indonesia can get positive impact on Firm Performance as well as its positive impact in direct relationship Corporate Social Responsibility has on Firm Performance.
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Performance, Firm Size
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anissa K. Sajian Utama. SWA XXIX. December 2013:26,28.
Rahayu EM. Sajian Utama. SWA XXVII. December 2011:38.
Abdillah W, Hartono J. Partial Least Square (PLS) Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Dalam Penelitian Bisnis. (Prabantini D, ed.). Yogyakarta: C.V Andi Offset; 2015.
Sugiarsono J. Sajian Utama. SWA XXX. December 2014:28.
Sugiarsono J. Sajian Utama. SWA XXXI. December 2015:30.
Anissa K. Sajian Utama. SWA XXVIII. December 2012:34.
Love I, Klapper LF. Corporate Governance, Investor Protection, and Performance in Emerging Markets. 2002;(April).
Carvalhal da Silva AL, Leal RPC. Revista Brasileira de Finanças. Brazilian Rev Financ. 2005;3(1):1-18.
Klapper L, Laeven L, Love I. Corporate governance provisions and firm ownership: Firm-level evidence from Eastern Europe. J Int Money Financ. 2006;25(3):429-444.
Ahmed Sheikh N, Wang Z, Khan S. The impact of internal attributes of corporate governance on firm performance. Int J Commer Manag. 2013;23(1):38-55.
Rashid K, Islam SMN. Corporate governance, complementarities and the value of a firm in
an emerging market: the effect of market imperfections. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc. 2013;13(1):70-87.
Manajemen JI, Vi V. Agustina at all 367 - 386 MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Volume VI, No. 3, Okt 2016. 2016;VI(3):367-386.
Mouselli S, Hussainey K. Corporate governance, analyst following and firm value. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc. 2014;14(4):453-466.
Wincent J. Does size matter? J Small Bus Enterp Dev. 2005;12(3):437-453.
Lima Crisóstomo V, de Souza Freire F, Cortes de Vasconcellos F. Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil. Soc Responsib J. 2011;7(2):295-309.
Al-Matari EM, Al-Swidi AK, Fadzil FHB. The Measurements of Firm Performance’s Dimensions. Asian J Financ Account. 2014;6(1):24.
Abdallah H, Valentine B, Abdullah H, Valentine B. Fundamental and Ethics Theories of Corporate Governance. Middle East Financ Econ. 2009;4(4):88-96.
François R. WORLD GOVERNANCE INDEX 1 - WGI – Why Should World Governance Be Evaluated , and for What Purpose ? 2009;(January).
International Finance Corporation. The Indonesia Corporate Governance Manual. Indones Corp Gov Man. 2014;1:1-533.
Pervan M, Višić J. Influence of Firm Size on Its Business Success. Croat Oper Res Rev. 2012;3:213-223.
Juniarti, Natalia TL. Corporate Governance Perception Index (CGPI) and Cost of Debt. Int J Bus Soc Sci. 2012;3(18):223-232.
Mujahid M, Abdullah A. Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm’s Financial Performance Ayub Mehar and Farah Rahat *. Eur J Bus Manag. 2007;1(1):16-24.
Udayasankar K. Corporate social responsibility and firm size. J Bus Ethics. 2008;83(2):167-175.
Omran MA, Ramdhony D. Theoretical Perspectives
on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Critical Review. Int J Account Financ Report. 2015;5(2):38.
Doğan M. Does Firm Size Affect The Firm Profitability ? Evidence from Turkey. Res J Financ Account. 2013;4(4):53-60.
An Y, Davey H, Eggleton IRC. The Effects of Industry Type, Company Size and Performance on Chinese Companies’ IC Disclosure: A Research Note. Australas Account Bus Financ J. 2011;5(3):107-116.
Abbasi A, Malik QA. Firms ’ Size Moderating Financial Performance in Growing Firms : An Empirical Evidence from Pakistan. Int J Econ Financ Issues. 2015;5(2):334-339.
Duchin F. Working Papers in Economics by. Seminar. 2007;(0704).
Hussein SK. Corporate Governance and Firm ’ s Value : An Empirical Analysis ofAgri -input firms in India. Int J Commer Bus Manag. 2013;2(6):353-362.
Babalola YA. The Effect of Firm Size on Firms Profitability in Nigeria. J Econ Sustain Dev. 2013;4(5):90-94.
Niresh JA, Velnampy T. Firm Size and Profitability: A Study of Listed Manufacturing Firms ed Manufacturing Firms in Sri Lanka. Int J Bus Manag. 2014;9(4):57-64.
Letza S, Kirkbride J, Sun X, Smallman C. Corporate governance theorising: limits, critics and alternatives. Int J Law Manag. 2008;50(1):17-32.
Haryono U, Iskandar R. Corporate Social Performance and Firm Value. 2015;4(11):69-75.
Othman R, Othman R. Higher education institutions and social performance: Evidence from public and private universities. Int J Bus Soc. 2014;15(1):1-18.
Mohamed T, Faouzi PJ. Interdependencies between Corporate Social Disclosure and. 2014;14(3).
Marie L’Huillier B. What does “corporate governance” actually mean? Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc. 2014;14(3):300-319.
Reddy YRK. The ethics of corporate governance. Int J Law Manag. 2009;51(1):17-26.
Servaes H, Tamayo A. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value : The Role of Customer Awareness The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value : The Role of Customer Awareness. Manage Sci. 2013;59(5):1045-1061.
Mishra S, Mohanty P. Corporate governance as a value driver for firm performance: evidence from India. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc. 2014;14(2):265-280.
Habbash M. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from Saudi Arabia. Soc Responsib J. 2016;12(4):740-754.
Fauziah W, Yusoff W, Alhaji IA. Insight of Corporate Governance Theories. J Bus Manag. 2012;1(1):52-63.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.